What costs what, and what needs seeing first.
Six treatments, every price published, and an honest column saying which ones you can simply book and which start with an assessment. Most clinics publish neither. We publish both on one page because a price you have to ring for is a price that moves depending on who is asking.
The whole list, on one page.
Prices are current and complete. There are no packages, no bundles and no member rate — the number below is the number.
| Treatment | Price | Booking | Broadly for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compression recovery | $100 | Direct | Recovery and circulation. Nothing is done to the skin. |
| Peptide infusion facial | $300–$350 | Assessment first | Hydration and condition. A facial, not a procedure. |
| Clinical peels | Face $220 · body from $350 | Assessment first | No fixed menu — the peel is chosen at your assessment. |
| Glass skin facial | $250 | Direct | Surface clarity and reflectivity, for an occasion or as upkeep. |
| Microneedling / BioRePeel | $300–$350 | Assessment first | Texture, scarring and firmness over a series. |
| Skin lesion treatment | From $250 | Assessment first | Anything that needs identifying goes to a GP before anything else. |
Some treatments are not listed here. Several are held while we settle regulatory questions we raised ourselves and have not closed — we would rather leave them off a price comparison than put a number beside something we cannot yet stand behind. Others do not belong in a comparison at all: microdermabrasion is not a separate booking here, it forms part of a clinical peel or the glass skin facial when the assessment calls for it. Ask in clinic.
The two marked Direct can be booked by phone on 0466 310 045 or through the treatment page. Anything marked Assessment first starts with a consultation.
Downtime is stated on each treatment page rather than here, because it varies with depth and with your skin — and a single word in a table would be the wrong answer for half the people reading it.
Four comparisons worth reading.
Where a table gives you the price, these give you the reasoning — including where the honest answer is to spend less.
Chemical against mechanical. Which suits reactive skin, which suits congestion, and when the answer is neither.
Microneedling vs chemical peelControlled injury against surface removal. Texture and matured scarring against tone and congestion.
In-clinic treatment vs at-home skincareThe comparison that costs us bookings to publish honestly: what you do daily beats what you do six times a year.
If you can only do one thingThe order that actually pays when you can’t afford everything. Treatments come last, and we mean it.
What a table can't tell you.
A comparison answers what is available and what it costs. It does not answer which of these is right for your skin this month, and the two questions get confused constantly.
The four in the top group can be booked on their merits — a facial is a facial. The rest depend on what your skin is doing, what you have had done before, and what you are already using at home. Those are questions with a person in them, which is what the consultation is.
And sometimes the answer is none of them. A reasonable proportion of consultations end with a change to skincare and nothing booked. That is not a failed appointment.
Both are facials, both are bookable directly, and they do different things.
What a consultation coversNinety minutes, $150, and you leave holding a written plan.
Questions worth asking firstHow this industry works, including the parts that are unflattering to us.
The questions people don’t ask out loud.
Asked by people trying to work out where to start.
If I can only afford one thing, what should it be?
Almost always the consultation, and we would say that even if it were free. Choosing a treatment without an assessment is a guess with a price on it, and the most common outcome of the assessment is spending less than people expected, in a different order.
Can I just do the cheaper one and see how it goes?
You can, and sometimes that is the right call. What it will not tell you is whether the cheaper one was the right one — if nothing changes, you learn nothing about why. That is the argument for assessing first, not a rule against trying.
Why publish this when it might send me elsewhere?
Because a price you have to ring for is a price that changes depending on who is asking. If the comparison sends you somewhere else, the comparison was honest and we would rather that than a booking made on incomplete information.